Abstract
If international private legal relations were directed to the conflict of laws approach, and what I learned from that, I learned what followed the conflict of laws crisis, which entailed thinking seriously about developing a new approach that goes beyond the restrictions surrounding the traditional way of working with the legal approach to entrusting private international legal relations based on a set of pre-prepared controls. By the national legislator, regardless of the type of Iran, under any law.
This thinking was carried out without taking into account the need to smooth out the procedures in international trade to a new events approach required with a special approach to the instructions that must be known from the beginning, based on the person who agrees without having to trade with the rule of attribution, and soon this application was developed and fed by two sources. The first material rules are those rules adopted by the national legislator, and the second are the rules of international origin resulting from a group of international agreements. However, these material rules, regardless of their importance, do not completely cancel the rules of attribution and the traditional approach, as they remain complementary rules that find their echo in trade contracts. International
Main Subjects