Abstract
The great importance of the medical profession has no limits, as a profession is a humanitarian and moral those who require intimate scientific and technical machine. And the exercise of medical activity must be consistent with the rules prescribed in the science of medicine, tends to cure the patient. observed in recent Alaoana that some of the doctors unaware of the provisions of the law in spite of the exercise of their professional responsibility brilliantly, even bitten by surprise but shocking including the right to take legal action as a result of the error in the practice of the profession. I have explained the penal legislator as is the use of the right to practice surgery, medical and business telemedicine other according to the origins of scientific generally accepted in the medical professions licensed when has the consent of the patient or the Attorney for a law explicitly or implicitly or if medical intervention is necessary in urgent cases that require it. that the conditions for permitted medical work in the license include the legal consent of the patient and the targeting of treatment and taking into account the scientific bases. The research deals with the historical development of the error in the act of the doctor as it is not recent, but is as old as medicine, the oldest known civilizations, particularly Babylonian civilization, specifically legislation of Hammurabi, known as the Egyptian civilization and Romanian. were then talk about the medical profession in Europe and the mistakes they remained in the clergy reluctant to hold sway for decades on the medicine, and those who did not mention them accountable for their mistakes because they derive Sultnthm of God. And then raised Madsthm penal for their mistakes in medical work, especially after the establishment of currents philosophical denounced cheating some doctors. Then dealing with the study definition of error in medical work and defining the criteria is and what is the nature and pictures of this error, which is reflected negligence and recklessness and lack of reserve and non-observance of laws, regulations and orders. As for the practical reality of doctor error during the megatrend of error in the diagnosis of disease and treatment in the description of error and error in anesthesia patient and finally the error in the surgical intervention?. As for the conclusion Vahtot recommendation for the organization of the Iraqi legislator describes the explicit provisions of organ donation and transplants, in particular, and that these practices hesitate between the permissible and the danger legitimately and legally.